Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Question #1: Leslie Limited is a manufacturing company that makes a single produ

ID: 2405836 • Letter: Q

Question

Question #1:

Leslie Limited is a manufacturing company that makes a single product – the “Whatchamacallit” Whatchamacallits go through two processing departments – Department #1 and Department #2.

The cost to manufacture a “Whatchamacallit” has historically been in the range of $2.94 to $3.00, with 80% of the cost being from Department #1. However, due to increased competition putting a squeeze on sales prices, Leslie’s management has realized that the cost to manufacture “Whatchamacallits” must be reduced. In recent months, several cost-cutting strategies have been put into place, particularly in Department #1. Leslie’s senior management team is anxiously awaiting the production report for Department #1 for the month of January to see whether the cost cutting strategies have worked.

Leslie Limited hired a new accountant in January of 2014. Her name is Emma. Emma, a Dal co-op student, only has a little experience with Process Costing, recently prepared a report that summarizes production and costs for Department #1 for January.

Here it Emma’s report:

Work in progress inventory Jan 1st – 8,000 units: materials 100% complete, conversion costs 80% complete

$20,000 (of which $5,000 is materials and $15,000 is conversion costs)

Materials costs added in January:

$27,000

Conversion costs added in January:

$75,000

Total costs of Department #1:

$122,000

Department #1 costs assigned to:

Units completed and transferred to Dept #2: 50,000 units at $2.44 each.

$122,000

Work in progress inventory, Jan 31st – 5,000 units: materials 100% complete, conversion 75% complete

_

The President of Leslie Limited reads the above report and becomes quite frustrated and confused. He does not understand how unit costs assigned in Dept. #1 could have increased despite the cost cutting efforts that have been made.

Required #1: Prepare a report for Department #1 showing how much cost should have been assigned to the units completed and transferred to Department #2 and to the ending WIP inventory.

Required #2: Explain to the President why the unit cost appearing on Emma’s report was higher than anticipated. Have the cost cutting strategies worked?

Work in progress inventory Jan 1st – 8,000 units: materials 100% complete, conversion costs 80% complete

$20,000 (of which $5,000 is materials and $15,000 is conversion costs)

Materials costs added in January:

$27,000

Conversion costs added in January:

$75,000

Total costs of Department #1:

$122,000

Department #1 costs assigned to:

Units completed and transferred to Dept #2: 50,000 units at $2.44 each.

$122,000

Work in progress inventory, Jan 31st – 5,000 units: materials 100% complete, conversion 75% complete

_

Explanation / Answer

Required 1.

Cost of Production Report for the month of January

Equivalent Units

Beginig Work in Process (Jan 1)

Completed and Transferred to Department 2

3,750 units

(5,000 * 75%)   

55,000 units   

Note : Units started into production = Ending WIP + Units Completed - Begining WIP

= 5,000 units + 50,000 units - 8,000 units

= 47,000 units

Cost Per Equivalent units

Cost Allocation/Assignment

Completed &Transferrd to Department 2

(50000 units * $2.26 each)

Required 2

Explain to the President why the unit cost appearing on Emma’s report was higher than anticipated. Have the cost cutting strategies worked?

Ans.

The units cost appearing on Emma's report is higher than anticipated, because Emma has not taken into consideration the calculation of equivalent units with respect to conversion cost, she has simply taken into consideration only completed and transferred units leaving behind the partially completed ending work in progress. Hence her cost per unit is not reliable.

The total cost per unit is coming approximately to $2.26 which is lower than the historical price range of $2.95 to $3.00. Hence, it is evident that cost cutting strategies has actually worked.

Flow of Units Direct Material Conversion

Beginig Work in Process (Jan 1)

8,000 units Started into Production (note) 47,000 units Total units into Production 55,000 units

Completed and Transferred to Department 2

50,000 units 50,000 units 50,000 units Ending Work in progress (Jan 31) 5,000 units 5,000 unis

3,750 units

(5,000 * 75%)   

Total Units Reconciled

55,000 units   

55,000 units 53,750 units