Need help with this study for ecology please and thank you any help will be appr

Question

Need help with this study for ecology please and thank you any help will be appreciated.

1.

Below are some additional results that help explain the strong or significant associations shown in Table 1 .Diet Guild About two-thirds of species that were roit Variable Importance 100.00 72.93 P-walue insectivores or frugivores were more abundant in the forested landscapes than human-dominated landscapes, Diet Guild while all nectarivores and omnivores and 86% of species that were granivores were more abundant or had similar Foraging Strata abundances in human-dominated matrix types to continuous forest. Nest Height 0.0113 Habitat Association 00788 02135 03944 04888 0.1566 0.1621 2639 0.7461 reve Taxonomic Order 28.93 25.54 19.29 8.26 8.46 2.61 Geographik Range Nest Type Nest Height: Most canopy-nesting species (86%) were more abundant in the forest landscape, while all groundal Range nesters had similar abundances across landscape typesBody Mass (75%) or were more abundant in one or more of the human-dominated matrix types (25%) 1 dutch Size Table 1. A measure of the association of with landscape matrix responses. species traits Variable Importance Habitat Association: Thirty percent of forest-restrictedis based on classification tree species had similar abundances across landscape types are based on randomized ests (values in boldfaoe and 70% were more abundant in the forest landscapes. | significant ar P

Explanation / Answer

12. In landscape ecology, matrix type refers to the ecological system or the surrounding environment of the species. Habitat fragmentation refers to habitat loss due to distribution of the habitat into patches and the inclusion of dissimilar habitats. Keeping these in mind, different species show different traits as a response to habitat loss.

For example,

In comparison to the dispersal hypothesis and the habitat compensation hypothesis, the above mentioned hypothesis are better supported by the species traits with landscape matrix response. The habitat compensation hypothesis talks about change in diet guild and nesting behaviour will cannot be supported with the given data, and the dispersal hypothesis cannot be explained with the mentioned traits.

13. From the given study, it can be learned that species conservation cannot be acted upon for all species at the same time with the same approach. Though it is possible for some species with adaptable traits with landscape matrix response to prosper in both forests and human-dominated environments, most species (canopy foragers, canopy nesting species, insectivores, etc) suffer due to a loss of their primary habitat. Conservation measures are further restricted by the lack of resources and the patches of primary habitat left.

14. As a follow-up to this study, I would recommend the following -

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse N
• Subjects

---