Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

III. (7 pts) Dr. Isbad conducted a psychophysics experiment to measure the faint

ID: 3501534 • Letter: I

Question

III. (7 pts) Dr. Isbad conducted a psychophysics experiment to measure the faintest sound a person can hear. He wanted to get a precise estimate of this terminal threshold, so he decided to use the method of limits staircase method. Below are the data from his subject. Dr. Isbad claims that the terminal threshold for all human hearing is 29. List and explain all the problems and errors committed by Dr. Isbad. Do you accept the value he obtained for his threshold? Why or why not? Given his data, what is the threshold value?

       

Trial

Stimulus

Response

1.

40

Yes

2.

15

No

3.

35

Yes

4.

30

Yes

5.

20

No

6.

15

No

7.

15

No

8.

20

No

9.

35

Yes

10.

10

No

11.

5

No

12.

15

No

13.

35

Yes

14.

30

Yes

15.

40

Yes

16.

30

No

17.

35

Yes

18.

5

No

19.

35

Yes

20.

10

No

21.

5

No

22.

20

No

23.

40

Yes

24.

10

No

25.

5

No

26.

20

No

27.

10

No

28.

40

Yes

29.

15

No

30.

20

No

31.

40

Yes

32.

30

Yes

33.

40

Yes

34.

10

No

35.

30

Yes

Trial

Stimulus

Response

1.

40

Yes

2.

15

No

3.

35

Yes

4.

30

Yes

5.

20

No

6.

15

No

7.

15

No

8.

20

No

9.

35

Yes

10.

10

No

11.

5

No

12.

15

No

13.

35

Yes

14.

30

Yes

15.

40

Yes

16.

30

No

17.

35

Yes

18.

5

No

19.

35

Yes

20.

10

No

21.

5

No

22.

20

No

23.

40

Yes

24.

10

No

25.

5

No

26.

20

No

27.

10

No

28.

40

Yes

29.

15

No

30.

20

No

31.

40

Yes

32.

30

Yes

33.

40

Yes

34.

10

No

35.

30

Yes

Explanation / Answer

Dr. Isbad is supposed to follow the staircase method in which the intensity of a stimulus is reduced until the observer makes a mistake, at which point the staircase 'reverses' and intensity is increased until the observer responds correctly, triggering another reversal. However the data shows that this method was not followed and stimulus intensity was presented at random at times. For instance, on the first trial, he presented an intensity of 40. This should have been followed by an intensity of 35 in the next trial but Dr. Isbad presented a value of 15. Also, from the data we can see that the stimulus value of 25 has not been presented to the subject. Therefore, we cannot adequately calculate the terminal threshold.