Tort Law Assignment. Uneeda Aircraft company made twin -engine airplanes for the
ID: 351148 • Letter: T
Question
Tort Law Assignment.
Uneeda Aircraft company made twin -engine airplanes for the private aviation market. On May 1/X10 Marcus was flying Uneeda Aircraft made in X/02 when one of the engines fell off the aircraft. Marcus had rented the aircraft from Flying Sweet Aircraft Rentals. The loss of the engine caused the plane to crash land. Marcus was not injured but the aircraft was judged to be a total loss. By contract with Flying Sweet, Marcus was responsible for insuring the aircraft for any damage and did so through Aviation Insurance Group for the agreed upon value in the Flying Sweet contract. Upon inspection it was found that the engine bolts had sheared off unexpectedly. Unsheared bolts that remained were tested and also found to be less durable than required by aviation code.
Aviation Insurance Group gave Marcus a reservation of rights letter because it said that the black box had recorded Marcus performing a loop maneuver prior to the accident. Accidents caused by stress from or accidents during such maneuvers are specifically excluded by the policy issued by Aviation Insurance Group. After receiving the reservation of rights letter, Marcus sued Uneeda Aircraft for negligent manufacturing of the airplane, specifically the engine bolts and Flying Sweet for faulty maintenance. Uneeda in turn decided it needed to counter -sue the engine bolt manufacture for faulty bolt manufacturing. However ten bolt companies had been used by Uneeda and Uneeda had no idea which bolt manufacturer provided the bolts for Marcus’ aircraft. Flying Sweet produced maintenance records that met standards for the industry and for this particular aircraft.
Answer these questions:
1) What are the negligence issues in this case?
2) Who are the plaintiffs; who are the defendants?
3) What steps would you take to sort out who might be negligent in this scenario?
Given what you have in this case:
4) Discuss who is negligent and to what extent and why you believe that this is the case.
5) Who would you as judge award damages to?
6) Would you as judge order Aviation Insurance Group to pay for the damaged aircraft?
Explanation / Answer
We are instructed to provide a solution for 4 parts of a problem. Please do. Not downvote.
1. The negligence issues that are presented in the case are.:-
A. Unwed aircraft did not check the integrity of the plane prior to sales. And, they did not maintain a record of parts that they had purchased from third-party manufacturers.
B. Marcus did not adhere to the safety standards by doing a loop which caused unnecessary stress on the already con promised part of the plane.
2. In this case, the plaintiff is Marcus and the defendant is Uneeda aircraft company.
3. To sort out the negligent party, in this case, proper records need to be obtained to check if the screws that were used on the aircraft were of substandard quality and if so, the negligence can be decided to be committed by either Marcus the plaintiff or Uneeda the aircraft company.
4. It is the responsibility of Uneeda to keep a record of where their inventory comes from and, properly testing out their product before selling them to be used on the field. Therefore, Uneeda plays a big part when it comes to the issue of negligence by parties.