Assuming that the plaintiff was able to prove she competently perform all her su
ID: 3890232 • Letter: A
Question
Assuming that the plaintiff was able to prove she competently perform all her supervisory duties, but the defendant proved that handling the machinery was a useful, though not essential, aspect of the job, do you think the firm has borne its burden of articulating a legitimate business reason for paying the plaintiff less than her white colleagues
864881 (M.D. Fla. 2015).] 10. The plaintiff, a black female, worked as a molding supervisor for the defendant. She sued, complaining that she was paid less than her counterparts, allExplanation / Answer
Consider plaintiff was able to prove all the things she could sue in the company in the court because there should not be any racial discrimination in the company.
in the company both the senior and junior in the company have to work together to get the job done so this environment will be co working place but the company with the people will have difference with the salary paid to them because of the importance to the company and how tactical they can work for the company, so only the salary differs for the people.
In some company some people are only to repair machine and other just to operate the machine because of the lack of the knowledge of the people so there will be difference in job role and salary.
in a company there are skill based worker and regular worker.
skill based worker are people have some special skills that are applied to the work to make the productivity happen regular work doesn’t need any knowledge but must able to work for 9 hours in a day and no skills required.