Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Bob owned a farm in Wayne County which fronted on a state highway. In 1990, Jane

ID: 418611 • Letter: B

Question

Bob owned a farm in Wayne County which fronted on a state highway. In 1990, Jane purchased an adjoining farm that had no highway frontage and could only be reached by a county road that was two miles from the state highway. Recognizing that it would shorten the access to her farm, in 1991 Jane asked Bob to sell her an interest that would allow her to use an existing dirt road across his farm, which led from her house directly to the state highway. Bob declined to make such a sale.
Nonetheless, over the next 25 years, Jane continuously used the dirt road for access to the state highway. Bob never said a word to Jane regarding this use. Jane’s house and the dirt road that commenced at the front of her house and continued across Bob’s farm were plainly visible to anyone on Bob’s farm.
In 2016, Tom visited Bob’s farm and offered to purchase it. Bob sold the farm to Tom for $200,000 and conveyed the property by warranty deed. A title search by Tom disclosed no encumbrances on the property.
When Tom moved onto the farm, he installed and locked a gate across the dirt road, thereby preventing Jane from its further use.
What are the respective rights of Jane and Tom with respect to the dirt road? Who is likely to prevail in a lawsuit commenced by Jane against Tom?

Explanation / Answer

By using the dirt road for 25 years to get access to the state highway without taking permission from Bob, a prescriptive easement is created by Jane. Jane has used the real property only for accessing the highway and hence has acquired the right to continue using the dirt road for that purpose by creating prescriptive easement. As the dirt road and Jane’s farm were plainly visible to anyone, it satisfies all the conditions to create prescriptive easement and can be proved in court without any written document. The prescriptive easement created by Jane is also appurtenant easement which is transferrable with the dominant tenement. It can be released only by the owner of the dominant tenement. Dominant tenement is the parcel of land which benefits from the easement, i.e. Janes’s land. The prescriptive tenement created by Jane is also perpetual and Tom cannot deny Jane from using the dirt road. Tom has acquired the right to use the land for own purpose by purchasing it for $200,000. Even though the title disclosed no encumbrances on the property, Tom cannot escape from the easement created by Jane over 25 years. Hence Jane is likely to prevail in the lawsuit.