Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Cement Kiln Dust Regulation Note: Before you start

ID: 461323 • Letter: C

Question

Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Cement Kiln Dust Regulation

Note:

Before you start working on this problem you need to develop some parameters (numbers). These numbers are derived from your own Panther ID Number and the two digits of your birth month

  

X1           = Sum of all digits above (P1 to P7 and B1 and B2) =29

X2           = P1+B2+1 =13

X3           = P2+B2 + 1 =14

X4           = P5 + 3 =6

X5           = B2+ 3 =12

In the assignment below, you are asked to use the above parameters (X1, X2, ...) in certain cases. Please use the appropriate numbers that you have calculated from your SSN.

Problem

                You have been recently appointed as a senior policy analyst by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (DER). Before you were hired, there had been a major controversy over the ways with which a cement factory at the outskirts of a small Florida town is disposing cement kiln dust (CKD), which is a very fine particulate material that is carried out of the kiln by exit gases during raw material burning. The city has been divided on this issue: one group, which is dependent on this factory as a major employer, wants to see the factory continue its current practices of CKD disposal; and the other group, led by Environmental Defense Fund, has sued the DER for not regulating the factory’s disposal activity. The Director of the Policy and Planning Division of your department wants to you to conduct a detailed cost-benefit analysis of regulating the CKD disposal activities for justifying the DER’s inaction in the court of law. The Director is not sure at this stage whether he can make a case. Just before you were hired, a private constancy group had collected technical and economic information required for your analysis.

Available Facts and Figures:

Annual generation of CKD by the factory under study is 100,000 tons.

Of the total CKD generated, 20% is sold for off-site uses, which does not pose any danger to the local community. Another X1 percent of the total CKD generated is recycled (returned to kiln), which also does not pose any problem. The remaining CKD is being disposed through three different systems in equal amounts: waste piles, abandoned quarries and landfills. All these methods are exposed and unlined, posing health and other types of risks at three separate sites.

CKD disposed through all three methods are identical in composition. The disposed CKD is found to contain arsenic, chromium and lead at following rates.

                Table 1

Attributes

Emission Rates of Contaminants

(µg/ton of CKD disposed)

Arsenic

X4

Lead

X2

Chromium

X3

Certain portion of the total amount of each contaminant (arsenic, lead and chromium) from each disposal site is found to leave the disposal site and contaminate groundwater, surface water and soil as follows.

                Table 2

Disposal

Method

Pollutants

Medium of Contamination

(Percent of total pollutant from each site reaching the medium)

Total

Percent

Underground-water

Surface

Water

Soil

Waste pile

Arsenic

25

10

35

70

Lead

30

15

20

65

Chromium

10

25

0

35

Abandoned Quarries

Arsenic

25

10

35

70

Lead

30

15

20

65

Chromium

10

25

0

35

Landfill

Arsenic

50

20

0

70

Lead

45

15

0

60

Chromium

10

20

0

30

Once they reach certain medium as shown in the above table, the three contaminants cause annual damage to humans, animals, crops and plants as estimated in the following equations:

                Table 3

Pollutants

Annual Total Damage (TD) in $ as a function of actual amounts of Arsenic (A), Lead (L) and Chromium (C)

Underground-water

Surface

Water

Soil

Arsenic

TD = 0.00003*A2

TD = 0.000025*A2

TD = 0.000005*A2

Lead

TD = 0.00002*L2

TD = 0.00006*L2

TD = 0.000008*L2

Chromium

TD = 0.000005*C2

TD = 0.000004*C2

--

                where A, L and C are the actual amounts of arsenic, lead and chromium in µg reaching

                the respective medium, respectively.

The factory has the following pollution prevention alternatives:

                                -- Recovery scrubbing (RS)

                                -- Fluid-bed Dust Recovery (FDR)

                                -- Leaching with Water (LW)

The above prevention alternative technologies are assumed to reduce the currently disposed CKD as below:

                        Table 4

Prevention

Technology

Reduction of CKD Disposed

(In Percent)

RS

55

FDR

45

LW

65

               

                Please be reminded that the above numbers are expressed in per cents of total CKD disposed to

                disposal sites, but not of the total CKD generated by the factory.

The initial and annual operating costs of above prevention technologies are estimated below. Also, the factory will lose certain percent of its current annual profit of $ X1 million because of the reductions in its total output.

                                Table 5

Prevention

Technology

Initial Costs ($)

Annual Operating

Costs ($)

Annual Reduction in Profits

(In Percents)

RS

100,000

25,000

0.50

FDR

75,000

20,000

0.40

LW

(3*X1) thousands

75,000

0.05

The Assignment

1.Develop the flow-charts for various contaminants from factory to three different media (groundwater, surface water and soil) under status quo and three different prevention technologies. Your flow-chart can be either pictorial (numbers should be presented for each node) or tabular.

2.     Develop annual estimates of damage saved from each prevention technology for all three different ambient media (groundwater, surface water and soil). Note that these estimates will be your benefit measures associated with each prevention technology.

3.     Conduct a cost-benefit analysis on alternative prevention technologies. For this analysis, assume a 10-year time period and a discount rate of X5 percent. Compute both benefit-cost ratios and net present values. What do these numbers mean? Explain.

4.     Make recommendations to your Director as to which technology would be most appropriate with justification.

Your final report on your analysis should strictly be your own. You are also encouraged to consult me until TWO days before the due date (NO MORE QUESTIONS THEREAFTER). The paper should be typed. Include the print-out of all the spread sheets. The project will be graded as follows: analysis 70%, the final recommendation 20%, and format 10% (I expect all the Excel analysis results to be properly arranged in table forms with proper table headings, column labels, footnotes, etc.).

In your write-up, I will be looking for completeness, which means the following content:

                Introduction with purpose of the analysis

                Basic facts, factors and variables considered in the analysis (briefly the re-statement of some

of the facts given above)

                Methodology

                Discussion of results

                Recommendation

QUESTION IS CURRENTLY BEING ANSWERED IN COURSE HERO!

Attributes

Emission Rates of Contaminants

(µg/ton of CKD disposed)

Arsenic

X4

Lead

X2

Chromium

X3

Explanation / Answer

X1= 29

X2= 13

X3 = 14

X4 = 6

X5 = 12

B2 = 9

P5=3

P2 = 4

P1 = 3

20 % of generated CKD sold off to Site

29 % of generated CKD recycled

Total CKD disposed= 51 %

CKD disposed through waste piles = 17 %

CKD disposed through abandoned quarries = 17 %

CKD disposed through landfills = 17 %

Emission rate of Arsenic = 6 µg/ton

Emission rate of Lead = 13µg/ton

Emission rate of Chromium = 14 µg/ton

Disposal Method

Pollutant

Under-ground water

Surface water

Soil

Total

Waste Pile

Arsenic

4.25 ton

1.7 ton

5.95 ton

11.9 tons

Lead

5.1 ton

2.55 ton

3.4 ton

11.05 tons

Chromium

1.7 ton

4.25 ton

0

5.95 tons

Abandoned quarries

Arsenic

4.25 ton

1.7 ton

5.95 ton

11.9 tons

Lead

5.1 ton

2.55 ton

3.4 ton

11.05 tons

Chromium

1.7 ton

4.25 ton

0

5.95 tons

landfills

Arsenic

8.5 ton

3.4 ton

0

11.9 tons

Lead

7.65 ton

2.55 ton

0

10.2 tons

Chromium

1.7 ton

3.4 ton

0

5.1 tons

Annual Total damage of underground water by arsenic = 0.00003*102

                                                                                                      =.00306  

Annual Total damage of surface water by arsenic = 0.000025*40.8

                                                                                                      =.00102

Annual Total damage of soil by arsenic = 0.000005*40.8

                                                                         =.000204

Annual Total damage of underground water by lead = 0.00002*232.05

                                                                                                      =.00464

Annual Total damage of surface water by lead = 0.00006*99.45

                                                                                                      =.00596

Annual Total damage of soil by lead = 0.000008*88.4

                                                                      =.000707

Annual Total damage of underground water by chromium = 0.000005*71.4

                                                                                                      =.000357

Annual Total damage of surface water by chromium = 0.000004*166.6

                                                                                                      =.00066

RS technology save = 28.05 ton

FDR technology save = 22.95 ton

LW technology save = 33.15 ton

Disposal Method

Pollutant

Under-ground water

Surface water

Soil

Total

Waste Pile

Arsenic

4.25 ton

1.7 ton

5.95 ton

11.9 tons

Lead

5.1 ton

2.55 ton

3.4 ton

11.05 tons

Chromium

1.7 ton

4.25 ton

0

5.95 tons

Abandoned quarries

Arsenic

4.25 ton

1.7 ton

5.95 ton

11.9 tons

Lead

5.1 ton

2.55 ton

3.4 ton

11.05 tons

Chromium

1.7 ton

4.25 ton

0

5.95 tons

landfills

Arsenic

8.5 ton

3.4 ton

0

11.9 tons

Lead

7.65 ton

2.55 ton

0

10.2 tons

Chromium

1.7 ton

3.4 ton

0

5.1 tons