Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

IN 200 WORDS OR MORE WITH AN APA SOURCE, WHY WOULD YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? When c

ID: 470424 • Letter: I

Question

IN 200 WORDS OR MORE WITH AN APA SOURCE, WHY WOULD YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? When considering the notion of “Psychological Size” and assessing the specific recommendations presented by Manning on how to equalize the perceived gap between employees and leaders I found in the text research that “psychological size has some relation to individuals who are in higher positions within a company. Those within the company who are in control of careers, wages and making the assignments have the most power over others within the company and have the authority to make any changes within the communication process” (Manning & Curtis, 2012) I think that there is definitely a gap between employees and leaders. Even though leaders know the ends and outs of a business, they sometime forget what it took to make them a leader. At a previous job that I had, the leader over the organization acted superior over employees beneath them and it cause a gap in communication. For example, when employees would ask simple questions or have concerns the leader would make belittling comments making the employee feel less than in being a part of the company. As stated in the text “People who possess positions of a higher standard sometimes do not know that others within the company may fear their power and show their behaviors accordingly” (Manning & Curtis, 2012) I personally think that if a person fears your presence or the authority that you possess they will not be as open to communicate with you due to fear of judgement. I have personally experienced having a leader that let their authority be known in a threatening way. It caused employees to avoid communication with him at all cause because he was not a very inviting person. In my opinion this can affect the culture of an organization in a negative way and cause a company to avoid reaching their highest potential. If their is no two-way communication involved and only one -way communication is being shown many things can have a one sided outcome which can be bad for business. I think that in any company there should be communication shown and given from all areas of the company no matter what an individual's rank is. When their is open communication involved it allows employees to feel comfortable and secure within their work environment causing them to perform better and be more successful overall. Resources Manning, G., & Curtis, K. (2012). The art of leadership (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill

Explanation / Answer

Open communication is fundamentally a perfect way of communication for any organization. Any organization is driven by how its senior most managers inculcate the values and culture among their subordinates and other employees. Since the organizations are driven by people, so how good or bad the culture of the organization is, or how positive or negative the communication is, or how reliable or unreliable the organizational structure is, everything depends on the people; people as in the senior management.

When people of an organization reach a level, they act in a most different way. This is a natural psychological act. Managers become directive instead of informative, they become demanding instead of being humble, they get intrigued with those who are performing better than them. Some managers become psychologically instable once they reach a position. They get frustrated very soon and demand results. They become egoistic in apologizing though they are wrong from their end. All this is because of the position they are in. Very few of them maintain a certain level of decency and decorum and be humble to their subordinates when they grow to higher positions.

If there is no two way communication in an organization then it is more likely that organizations fail because of those superior authority who are not respectable to their position. Organizations with a one way communication and a threatening and demanding leaders will have employees who are always under performing, low morale, and highly dissatisfied . They do not stay longer with the organization.

So, it is very important for the senior management to have a worthy and healthy relationship with its employees along with having an effective two way communication. It is always important to keep the employees and working staff comfortable with the surroundings. This not only increases the productivity but also generates positive and healthy relationship among the senior management and their subordinates and peers.