Rhetorical analysis Fattima Abedalamir Brandon White ENGL-/20/2022 ✓ Solved

What is the rhetorical situation? The article's rhetorical situation is whether online dating websites positively or negatively influence romantic relationships. Considering that technology has both positive and negative impacts on society, the big question is how the balance can be achieved to provide the overall results of claiming whether online dating sites are a positive or negative move. Who is the author of the article? The article was written by Monica Anderson, Emily Vogels, and Erica Turner. The article was published in February 2020. All the authors of the report were motivated by the fact that there is no clear side to online dating sites' impact on romantic relationships.

What is the intention of the author in speaking? The author intended to answer the rhetorical questions concerning online dating's impact on romantic partners' interrelationships. The analysis provided based on the positive and negative effects of online dating was intended to pass the message to the audience on using online dating sites to benefit their relationship. Who makes up the audience? The audience for the message of the authors is internet users who would like to use online dating sites or are already using an online dating site to understand both the positive and negative impact of the site so that they can make informed decisions.

What is the content of the message? Technology has both positive and negative impacts on dating sites, as explained in the article. On the positive side, it strengthens relationships and emotions between two partners. On the negative side, technology acts as a medium where individuals can chat with others, hence giving dating less attention. The author argues that dating has improved for the last five years due to people understanding dating sites and using them to get suitable partners.

What is the form in which the message is conveyed? The author used evidence-based strategies to explain the changes in dating, giving examples of dating methods in the past five years and comparing them with the current dating methods. Additionally, the author uses a persuasive technique by appropriate use of ethos, logos, and pathos. On ethos, the author related changes in dating technology concerning ethics within society. On logos, the author used persuasion by providing evidence showing how in the last five years dating was different compared to the current situation. With evidence, it is easier to visualize the changes in how dating is being managed.

On pathos, the article uses words to convey emotions related to dating events. It compares the current use of technology facilitating joy in relationships, despite the two partners being apart. How do form and content correspond? The choice of form depends on the nature of the content; emotionally driven content is written to evoke feelings from the audience. Logical arguments corresponded with the content through the clear separation of positive and negative impacts. Does the message succeed in fulfilling the author’s intention? Yes, the message fulfills the author's intention of describing both the negative and positive impacts of online dating sites.

What does the nature of the communication reveal about the culture that produced it? The communication indicates a preference for online dating among people, driving the need for analysis of the positive and negative impacts to make rational decisions based on their culture.

Paper For Above Instructions

Rhetorical analysis is a critical examination of how language and communication impact the audience. In this case, we analyze the article by Monica Anderson, Emily Vogels, and Erica Turner, which explores the effects of online dating on romantic relationships. This analysis applies the nine essential questions pertinent to rhetorical situations, which provide an in-depth reinforcement of the authors' arguments.

The rhetorical situation revolves around the influence of online dating websites on romantic relationships. The authors seek to assess whether online dating is predominantly beneficial or detrimental. With modern technological advancements, the core inquiry is how this evolution can be appropriately managed to foster positive relationships.

The intention of the authors is to elucidate the complexities associated with online dating. Through their analysis, they aim to inform potential and current users of these platforms about both the advantages and disadvantages associated with dating websites. This effort serves to empower individuals, equipping them with necessary knowledge to navigate the digital dating landscape productively.

The intended audience encompasses internet users contemplating entering or currently engaged in online dating. This demographic may include people from various backgrounds seeking companionship, underscoring the importance of a well-informed consumer base capable of making educated choices regarding their relationship pursuits.

As the authors highlight, technology encompasses both positive and negative dimensions related to online dating. From strengthening emotional bonds through instant communication to potential distractions caused by excessive engagement on social media, the analysis presents a balanced perspective that invites readers to consider the broader implications of their online interactions.

In conveying their message, the authors rely on evidence-based strategies. They meticulously compare historical dating practices with contemporary online methods, leveraging persuasive elements including ethos, logos, and pathos. These rhetorical strategies reinforce their credibility by framing the analysis within ethical, logical, and emotional contexts.

Logically, the authors’ arguments are structured coherently. They demonstrate how the evolution of communication, alongside the advent of technology, reframes romantic interactions. The evidence presented—ranging from statistics on user experiences to psychological insights—further strengthens their perspectives.

However, emotional resonance is equally integral to their analysis. By discussing the joy and excitement that often accompanies online dating, the authors establish connectivity with their readers, drawing on shared experiences associated with the digital dating narrative.

The correspondence between form and content throughout the article plays a pivotal role in reinforcing the overall message. The authors’ choice to blend data with emotive language presents a holistic view of online dating, catering to audiences who value both analytical insights and sentimental explorations of romantic relationships.

Ultimately, the effectiveness of the authors’ message lies in their ability to convey a comprehensive understanding of online dating's multifaceted nature. They successfully illuminate both the positive and negative ramifications, encouraging readers to approach these platforms with clarity and informed caution. This balanced view aligns neatly with the intentions outlined in the introductory sections of the analysis.

Reflecting on the cultural implications of the communication produced by the authors, it reveals a society that is increasingly reliant on digital means of connecting. This trend indicates a generational shift towards virtual platforms that condition interpersonal interactions, warranting careful examination of the validity and societal impact of these emerging dating practices.

In conclusion, a rhetorical analysis of the authors' work emphasizes the significance of understanding the evolving nature of human connection in the digital era. By unraveling the complexities of online dating, we discern the vital intersection between technology and romance, paving the way for more meaningful relationships while navigating potential pitfalls associated with this modern phenomenon.

References

• Anderson, M., Vogels, E. A., & Turner, E. (2020). The Five Years That Changed Dating.
• Fetters, A. (2020). The Impact of Online Dating on Modern Relationships. The Atlantic.
• Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2013). Online Dating & Relationships. Pew Research Center.
• Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a Mate: The Rise of Internet Dating. The American Sociological Review.
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research.
• Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C. (2011). First Comes Love, Then Comes Google: An Examination of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies in Online Dating. Communication Research.
• Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. The Aspen Institute.
• Weiser, E. B. (2000). The Impact of Internet Communication on Relationships. Journal of Social Issues.
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.
• Disch, L. (2017). Tinder and the Modern Dilemma of Dating. Social Media + Society.