Richard II: From Ceremony to Farce, and Engendering Show The ✓ Solved

Analyze the immediate consequences of stopping the tournament in Richard II: Mowbray is banished for life. Bolingbroke is banished for 10 years (reverted to 6 out of sympathy for Gaunt). When Bolingbroke arrives with his large army, Richard, a day late returning from Ireland, learns of his troops' desertions and isolates himself at Flint Castle. Bolingbroke quickly returns to England after launching a fleet from Brittany following Gaunt’s death, when Richard seizes Gaunt’s goods to fund his wars in Ireland. Discuss Bolingbroke's motivations and the emergence of a new order that even he does not fully understand, as conveyed through the Queen's reaction to his landing. Examine Bolingbroke's character as a representation of a coming change and analyze Richard's destabilization amid this transition, along with his physical descent and loss of identity as King. Delve into his existential struggles and the implications of language throughout the play that highlights the farcical representation of authority, including the second gage scene's purpose and its reflections on masculinity, femininity, and power in the context of show and representation. Finally, explore Richard's soliloquy in prison and his metaphor of a clock, connecting it to Elizabeth's Rainbow Portrait and concepts from René Descartes' philosophy.

Paper For Above Instructions

Shakespeare’s play "Richard II" intricately weaves themes of power, identity, and the transition from an old to a new order through its characters and scenes. The immediate consequences of the tournament's cancellation set off a chain reaction that alters the dynamics of authority and loyalty in the realm. Mowbray, banished for life, and Bolingbroke, initially banished for ten years before his time is reduced to six out of sympathy for his father Gaunt, mark the crumbling of Richard's grip on the throne.

As Bolingbroke returns to England with a large following, Richard's absence and military failures lead to significant unrest. When he hears of his troops' desertions while isolated in Flint Castle, it underscores the fragility of his authority. Bolingbroke’s swift action after Gaunt's death, particularly his decision to seize Gaunt’s possessions to fund his Irish wars, showcases Richard's desperation and declining power, reflecting a monarchy that is losing touch with its subjects. Bolingbroke’s intentions appear unclear even to him, as he embarks on a journey that challenges the established monarchy.

The Queen’s response to news of Bolingbroke’s landing incorporates a sense of foreboding—her words reveal a deep recognition of the upheaval on the horizon. The phrase “midwife to my woe” symbolizes the birth of a tumultuous new order, which she perceives as a threat to the status quo. This acknowledgment of change aligns with the unfolding narrative in which Bolingbroke embodies a challenge not only to Richard's kingship but also to the entrenched values of fealty and divine right that have governed their society.

Bolingbroke, as he facilitates the transition into this new order, epitomizes the struggle between the established norms of kingship and the burgeoning power of the nobility. The character's development suggests that he is grappling with a new identity, one that the audience can perceive even before it is fully articulated in the play. This uncertainty creates a space for a new political reality that questions traditional power structures.

Richard’s profound destabilization is manifested through his self-reflection as he later descends from his royal status. His metaphysical crisis is critiqued through his evolving language; he moves from affirming his kingship to expressing a dislocation of identity as he vacillates between “nothing” and “king.” This descent signifies a broader comment on the disintegration of the ‘Chain of Being’—the notion that all ranks in society should have a divine order, which now appears shifted and unsteady.

Moreover, Shakespeare introduces farce in the retelling of political and personal conflict to highlight how political theater transforms power dynamics. The second gage scene reveals the ceremonial essence of leadership, illustrating how political engagements are mere performances. Bolingbroke's observation regarding the scene being altered from a “serious thing” to “the Beggar and the King” deepens the comedic in the tragic, showing that authority plays out as a stagecraft where both men and women partake in a farcical game, undermining the gravity of their situations.

Interestingly, femininity is woven throughout this narrative, symbolically connecting the world of “show” to power. The Duchess of York acts as a contrast to the earlier masculinized notion of political resolution, representing a transformation in the perception of female power within this chaotic landscape. In the play, femininity can be depicted both as a source of vulnerability and a catalyst for action, making the characters, particularly the women, pivotal to understanding the boundaries of power when entangled with 'show.' Shakespeare skillfully reflects on this through language as the often-expected roles of femininity become complex, leaving room for interpretation of empowerment in the political realm.

As Richard arrives at the culmination of his self-doubt during his prison soliloquy, he embodies the struggle of a dethroned king wrestling with his identity, much like the philosophical inquiries made by Descartes. Reflecting upon the passage of time and existence, Richard’s metaphor of a clock symbolizes his realization of control fluctuating out of reach. Thus, his fixation on time and self becomes a poignant reminder of the debris of authority—remnants that cannot escape the realities of a new world order that has forged ahead without him.

In conclusion, "Richard II" compellingly illustrates the transition from ceremony to farce, while ingeniously exploring theories of representation and authority. Through the interplay of character motivations and the thematic depth of language, Shakespeare confronts the uncertainties of power structures, identity, and the implications of women's roles in a shifting political landscape. The outrageousness of the court, juxtaposed against the gravity of Richard’s downfall, ultimately serves as a reflection of the chaos and fragility embedded in the fabric of society when old orders give way to new ones.

References

  • Shakespeare, William. "Richard II." Cambridge University Press, 2003.

  • Holland, Peter. "Shakespeare's History Plays: Performance, Politics and the Past." Bloomsbury Arta, 2015.

  • Gibbons, Brian. "The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's History Plays." Cambridge University Press, 2002.

  • Griffiths, Emma. "The Politics of Gender in Richard II." Renaissance Quarterly, vol. 62, no. 2, 2009, pp. 375-398.

  • Beier, Andrew. "The Changing Faces of Richard II." Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 2, 2002, pp. 159-180.

  • Montgomery, James. "The Language of Power in Richard II." Journal of English Literary History, vol. 60, no. 3, 1993, pp. 621-641.

  • Carroll, David. "The Farce of Thyne: Richard II and the Rhetoric of Authority." Shakespeare Studies, vol. 44, 2016, pp. 145-162.

  • Dollimore, Jonathan. "Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries." Stockton Press, 1984.

  • Bradley, A.C. "Shakespearean Tragedy." Macmillan, 1922.

  • Descartes, René. "Meditations on First Philosophy." Cambridge University Press, 1996.