Running Head Case Study Essay1case Study Essay3please Delete All ✓ Solved

CASE STUDY ESSAY 3: This assignment should be written adhering to the guidelines of Standard English. This means that your thoughts should be well organized, logical, and unified as well as original with the viewpoint and purpose clearly established and sustained. Standard English guidelines also include the use of correct grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure. All writing should be in current APA formatting and citation style.

As a reminder, your assignment should be 2–3 pages, not including the title and reference pages.

In this first paragraph, you will introduce the purpose of this essay. Be sure to use APA formatting to support your work throughout the paper. Please leave the black APA level headings in this template and place your answers below the heading in paragraph form.

Times When a HSP Breaks Confidentiality

In this paragraph, explain confidentiality and the times when a human service professional would have to break confidentiality. Be sure to refer to your state law and the NOHS Code of Ethics.

How Personal Beliefs, Values, Prejudices, and Stereotypes Affect Relationships

Next, based on your readings and other credible sources you may find, discuss how personal values, beliefs, prejudices, and stereotypes can help or harm the helping process. Be sure to address each one and support your points with the credible resources. Please note that this is a general discussion and is not meant to be related to the case study of Reggie & Todd.

Ethical & Legal Obligations Related to Reggie & Todd

Then, using the case study of Reggie and Todd, discuss the potential ethical and legal issues surrounding the case. Include what your professional obligations would be regarding those issues. Please be sure to support your points with the NOHS Code of Ethics and your state law.

HSP Actions in Unclear Ethical/Legal Situations

In this paragraph, discuss what a human service professional can do to gain more insight if they are unclear on what to do in an ethical or legal situation with a client. Aim for two ideas that a human service professional can utilize and discuss the rational for those ideas.

Conclusion

In the final paragraph, please provide a summary wrapping up the paper for the reader.

Review the Assignment Rubric for more information.

References should include at least two references used in APA format, one of which can be your text, and the other should be from a peer-reviewed journal or article found in the Purdue Global Library.

Paper For Above Instructions

The purpose of this case study essay is to explore the complexities of confidentiality within the human services profession, specifically discussing how personal beliefs, values, prejudices, and stereotypes can impact client relationships. It will also address the ethical and legal obligations that arise in the context of the case study of Reggie and Todd, alongside the available options for human service professionals when encountering ethical dilemmas.

Times When a HSP Breaks Confidentiality

Confidentiality is a fundamental principle in human services that promotes trust between clients and professionals. However, there are specific circumstances under which a human service professional (HSP) must break this confidentiality. According to the National Organization for Human Services (NOHS) Code of Ethics, confidentiality may be breached if a client poses a danger to themselves or others, or if there is suspected abuse or neglect of children, elderly individuals, or vulnerable adults (NOHS, 2015). Additionally, legal obligations might dictate instances where divulging information is necessary, such as through court orders or when mandated by state law (Miller, 2020).

How Personal Beliefs, Values, Prejudices, and Stereotypes Affect Relationships

Personal beliefs, values, prejudices, and stereotypes significantly affect the helping process in human services. First, personal values can either enhance or hinder a helping relationship. A professional who values empathy and respect is likely to build strong connections with clients (Crisp & Turner, 2010). Conversely, prejudices or stereotypes about a particular population can lead to misjudgments and hinder effective communication, thereby damaging the therapeutic alliance (McLeod, 2009). For instance, if a helper carries a stereotype that individuals from a certain demographic are less worthy of assistance, this can create a rift in trust and openness (Vogel et al., 2011). Therefore, it is essential for HSPs to engage in self-reflection and seek education on cultural competencies to mitigate biases and improve their practice.

Ethical & Legal Obligations Related to Reggie & Todd

The case study of Reggie and Todd presents potential ethical and legal concerns associated with confidentiality breaches. Given the nature of their circumstances, it is crucial to analyze the professional obligations outlined in the NOHS Code of Ethics, which emphasizes client welfare and the importance of informed consent (NOHS, 2015). If there are indications that Todd may be at risk due to Reggie's behavior, the HSP must assess whether immediate action is required to protect Todd, even if this entails breaching confidentiality. Adherence to state laws regarding mandatory reporting of certain offenses further complicates this scenario, as the HSP must navigate the legal landscape while ensuring ethical compliance (Johnson, 2021).

HSP Actions in Unclear Ethical/Legal Situations

When faced with ethical or legal situations that lack clarity, HSPs can adopt specific strategies to gain insight. First, consulting with colleagues or supervisors is critical; discussions can provide diverse perspectives and offer a clearer understanding of ethical responsibilities (Turner & Wainwright, 2013). Secondly, engaging in professional development opportunities, such as workshops on ethics and legality in human services, allows for updated knowledge and guidance from subject matter experts (Gray, 2019). Both approaches enable HSPs to navigate complexities more effectively and provide sound responses to clients.

Conclusion

This essay has highlighted the intricate interplay between confidentiality, personal beliefs, and ethical obligations in the human services field. By understanding when confidentiality may be broken and recognizing the potential impact of one’s values and biases, HSPs can foster healthier client relationships. Furthermore, the examination of ethical obligations in the context of the case study underscores the need for vigilance and proactive measures to ensure client safety. Ultimately, continuous learning and reflection within the profession is crucial to effectively address the challenges presented by situations like those involving Reggie and Todd.

References

  • Crisp, R., & Turner, R. N. (2010). Essential social psychology. Sage.

  • Gray, R. (2019). Ethical dilemmas in social work: Learning from experience. Journal of Social Work Practice, 33(3), 231-245.

  • Johnson, L. (2021). The interplay of ethics and law in human services. Journal of Human Services Law, 45(2), 45-60.

  • McLeod, J. (2009). An introduction to counseling (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

  • Miller, J. (2020). Confidentiality and its exceptions in human services. Social Work Journal, 65(4), 10-15.

  • NOHS. (2015). National Organization for Human Services: Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.nohs.org/

  • Turner, S., & Wainwright, L. (2013). Ethics in professional practice: A guide for practitioners. Human Services Today, 27(4), 23-36.

  • Vogel, D. L., Wade, N. G., & Haake, S. (2011). Measuring the negative effects of seeking mental health treatment: The therapy stigma scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(2), 393-402.