There are Two Papers assigned. PAPERS: One and Two General ✓ Solved

There are two papers assigned. For each of the two papers, you will be responsible for watching a film, writing a 3 to 5 page essay in which you respond to prompts, and then providing a list of “My Criteria for Quality in Film.”

The process includes making any arrangements necessary to view the films and write about them. Some films may be available for streaming; others may be available for checkout from your local public library, while others may need to be rented. It is advised to watch the films on the largest possible screen and at the highest possible resolution.

Each paper requires you to watch a film in addition to the ones you will be watching for the week’s discussion, so be sure to leave yourself enough time to watch the film, think, write a first draft, edit, and revise.

These assignments are reaction papers, not plot summaries or research papers. Write what you have to say about the film, not what others have said, but understand how the film was made. The papers will be graded based on evidence that you are reading and viewing the course content, making comparisons to relevant films you have seen, and using film vocabulary introduced in class, along with college-level writing skills.

Clear presentation of your opinions and reasonable explanations and justifications to support those opinions are expected. In this 300-level course, you should explain why you think the way you do about the film and justify your opinions with explanations.

The first paper assignment requires you to view a feature film made before 1970 by a great director. Comment on the specific film you saw in terms of its genre and quality. Pay attention to the cinematography, editing, and sound. Discuss what you liked and disliked about the film and why, and evaluate how successfully it creates a work of fiction using the craft of filmmaking and considering when it was made.

Part 2 requires drawing general conclusions about the work of the director and one of the main actors or actresses, linking your overall impression of the film to its genre and time period. Parts one and two should be presented as a single essay.

Part 3 is a separate page titled "My Criteria for Quality in Film," proposing four general statements indicative of your personal taste in movies, numbered (1) through (4), and written as complete sentences or a short paragraph. This will later be expanded for the second paper.

Paper For Above Instructions

Title: Evaluation of "Lawrence of Arabia" Directed by David Lean

The film "Lawrence of Arabia," released in 1962 and directed by David Lean, is a monumental cinematic achievement that has captivated audiences for decades. As a feature film made before 1970 by a highly regarded director, it provides a rich ground for analysis through the lenses of its technical execution, thematic depth, and cultural impact. This essay will consist of a detailed critique of "Lawrence of Arabia," addressing its genre characteristics, specific elements of filmmaking such as cinematography and sound, personal receptions, and the significance of its historical context.

From the opening scenes, "Lawrence of Arabia" establishes itself as an epic biographical drama, fitting snugly within the genre of war films while also encapsulating themes of identity, colonialism, and heroism. The film chronicles the life of T.E. Lawrence, focusing on his experiences during World War I in North Africa and the Arab revolt against the Ottoman Empire. One of the most striking elements is the film's cinematography, helmed by the legendary Freddie Young. The expansive desert landscapes, captured in breathtaking Technicolor, provide a visual splendor that enhances the narrative's grandiosity.

In particular, the iconic shot of the vast desert sands stretches infinitely, beautifully underscores the themes of isolation and freedom prevalent in Lawrence's journey. The camera work captures not just the beauty of the surroundings but also serves to reflect Lawrence's internal struggles and the clash of cultures he experiences. Moreover, the use of long shots amplifies the scale of the film, making the characters appear small and vulnerable against the backdrop of the desert, which metaphorically conveys the overwhelming nature of the conflict and the vastness of the world around them.

The editing, orchestrated by Anne V. Coates, plays a pivotal role in translating the screenplay into a coherent narrative. The film's pacing, alternating between sweeping epic sequences and intimate character moments, holds the viewer's attention while facilitating character development. The rhythmic montage during the battle scenes juxtaposes intense action with the quieter moments of reflection, effectively highlighting Lawrence's dual nature as both a soldier and a strategist.

The sound design is equally impressive, featuring a sweeping score by Maurice Jarre that remains iconic in its own right. The evocative music heightens emotional stakes and enhances the atmosphere of each scene, encapsulating Lawrence's heroic yet tragic journey. Furthermore, the sound editing captures the stark contrasts between the cacophony of war and the serene sounds of the desert, immersing the audience in Lawrence's experience.

Regarding my personal response to the film, I found that my appreciation stemmed from the nuanced performances delivered by Peter O’Toole as T.E. Lawrence. O’Toole’s portrayal embodies the complexity of Lawrence's character, reflecting his charm, intellect, and torment. The depth and range of emotions he conveys resonate strongly, allowing viewers to empathize with his internal conflicts and motivations. This emotional connection is juxtaposed with my critique of the film’s pacing at times, where some sequences felt protracted, potentially losing audience engagement. However, this deliberate pacing can also be interpreted as a means of allowing deep reflection on the significant themes presented.

In evaluating whether the film successfully creates a work of fiction through the craft of filmmaking, I am inclined to assert that "Lawrence of Arabia" embodies a landmark achievement in cinematic history. While it is entirely possible to appreciate a film that may not be conventionally “good,” Lean's opus exemplifies the integration of various cinematic techniques, from cinematography to sound, that work harmoniously to engage viewers on multiple levels. The film not only entertains but also prompts critical reflection on the impact of war and colonialism, as exemplified through Lawrence's journey.

As we transition to part two of the analysis, it is essential to explore the broader implications of Lean's directorial vision. David Lean is known for his meticulous attention to detail and ability to create epic narratives that resonate deeply with audiences. His films often transcend mere storytelling, exploring larger existential questions and the human condition.

In the role of T.E. Lawrence, Peter O’Toole's performance is nothing short of remarkable. He captures the essence of Lawrence’s duality; a man torn between his loyalty to his British identity and his admiration for the Arab cause. I found O’Toole's portrayal compelling, as it highlights the internal struggles Lawrence faces throughout the film. His journey from an enigmatic outsider to a central figure in the Arab revolt is emblematic of the complexities of colonial relationships and identity. My conclusion is that both Lean’s direction and O’Toole’s performance converge to create a film that transcends the traditional boundaries of cinema, inviting us to reflect on timeless themes still relevant today.

My overall impression of "Lawrence of Arabia" is that it stands as a seminal work within the war film genre and cinematic history. Its characterization, technical prowess, and thematic richness solidify its legacy as an exemplary film from the pre-1970 era. Moreover, its timeless question of heroism and identity continues to resonate with audiences, making it an enduring classic worthy of analysis and appreciation.

In the final part of this assignment, I will propose four general statements that reflect my personal criteria for quality in film. These criteria are: (1) Exceptional films must feature strong character development that allows audiences to connect emotionally with the protagonist. (2) Quality films should effectively use cinematography to enhance storytelling, creating a memorable visual experience. (3) The narrative should provoke thoughtful engagement with important themes relevant to society and humanity. (4) A successful film should leave audiences with lasting impressions, offering reflections that extend beyond the credits.

References

• Lean, D. (Director). (1962). Lawrence of Arabia [Film]. Columbia Pictures.
• Coates, A. V. (Editor). (1962). Lawrence of Arabia [Film]. Columbia Pictures.
• Young, F. (Cinematographer). (1962). Lawrence of Arabia [Film]. Columbia Pictures.
• Jarre, M. (Composer). (1962). Lawrence of Arabia [Film]. Columbia Pictures.
• Cook, D. A. (2008). A History of Narrative Film. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Giannetti, L. (2010). Understanding Movies. Pearson Higher Ed.
• Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2010). Film Art: An Introduction. McGraw Hill.
• Stam, R. (2000). Film Theory: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Monaco, J. (2000). How to Read a Film: Movies, Media, and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
• Schatz, T. (1981). Film Genres. Random House.