Quality Motors, Inc., refused to sell a car to Hays because he was only 16 years
ID: 1227807 • Letter: Q
Question
Quality Motors, Inc., refused to sell a car to Hays because he was only 16 years old. However, Quality told Hays that they would sell the car to an adult and then show Hays how to transfer the title to his name. Hays agreed with the scheme and came back with a friend who was 23. Quality sold the car to Hays's friend. Quality then gave Hays the name of a notary public who would transfer the title to Hays. After the transfer was accomplished, Hays's father found out about the deal and tried to get Quality Motors to take the car back. Quality replied that the car had been sold to an adult, so Hays could not disaffirm the contract. Is Quality correct? Explain. Quality Motors v. Hays, 225 S.W.2d 326 (AR).
Explanation / Answer
Ans: Quality is right declined to offer an auto to Hays since he was just 16 years of age. In any case, Quality told Hays that they would offer the auto to a grown-up and after that demonstrate to Hays industry standards to exchange the title to his name. Feeds concurred with the plan and returned with a companion who was 23. Quality sold the auto to Hays' companion. Quality then gave Hays the name of a legal official open who might exchange the title to Hays. After the exchange was expert, Hays' dad got some answers concerning the arrangement and attempted to get Quality Motors to take the auto back. Quality answered that the auto had been sold to a grown-up, so Hays couldn't disaffirm the contract.Hays attempted to give back an auto he bought as a minor however the merchant wouldn't acknowledge it. Regardless of the way that the auto was destroyed, the court held that he could disaffirm. Roughages could disaffirm in spite of the crash.Hays' dad did not constrain him into the contract.Hays did not disaffirm in the wake of achieving his lion's share.