Please be as detailed as possible. I would love to get thumbs up to boost your e
ID: 157852 • Letter: P
Question
Please be as detailed as possible. I would love to get thumbs up to boost your expert rating but if the question not answered its hard to do so.
1. Describe various approaches to regulatory control strategies
2. How do you know that the Clean Air Act is working? Please provide examples.
3. The 1970 Clean Air Act (CAA) required one approach to hazardous air pollutants, and the 1990 CAA required a completely different approach. So what is the difference between the ‘NESHAP’s and the ‘HAP’s? Is there a difference in not only pollutants but approach? What is it? Why? What is the logic difference between the two approaches? The Residual Risk standards will tend to tie the two approaches back together it seems (without tying the pollutants back together). How will it do that?
4. Name and describe one control/technology technique for each of the below pollutant emission phases: 1) particulate; 2) gaseous.
5. Fill in the blanks:
Most States adopt Federal standards because _______________________________________and __________________________________________.
Explanation / Answer
1.A control strategy is a combination of discrete and specific measure taken to control the air pollution. These methods can be specific as mobile or stationary.
2.By monitoring the air quality. There are various parametres to analyse the air pollution in the area . If the pollutant is reducing then it is working
3.These terms are used interchangabely when discussing the clean air act under section 112 d. The full form of NESHAP is national emission standar for HAP.
HAP means hazardous air pollutants and it control the emission of air pollutant in the environment