I only need part C 1-50 In the 1970s the Ford Motor Company sold its suh. nd rt-
ID: 1867970 • Letter: I
Question
I only need part C 1-50 In the 1970s the Ford Motor Company sold its suh. nd rt- di- nd compact Pinto model with known design def In particular, the gas tank's design and location led to rupture, leaks, and explosion in low-speed, rear- impact collisions. Fifty-nine people burned to death in Pinto accidents. In a cost-benefit analysis weigh- ing the cost of fixing the defects (S11 per vehicle) versus the firm's potential liability for lawsuits on behalf of accident victims, Ford had placed the value of a human life at $200,000. Ford eventually recalled 1.4 million Pintos to fix the gas tank problem for a cost of $30 million to $40 million. In addition the automaker ultimately paid out millions more in liability settlements and incurred substantial damage to its reputation. (a) Critique Ford's actions from the perspective of ec the NSPE Code of Ethics. (b) One well-known ethical theory, utilitarianism, suggests that an act is ethically justified if it results in the "greatest good for the greatest number" when all relevant stakeholders are con- sidered. Did Ford's cost-benefit analysis validly apply this theory? (c) W hat should engineers do when the product they are designing has a known safety defect with an inexpensive remedy? Contributed by Joseph State University R. Herkert, North CarolinaExplanation / Answer
On the ground of ethics, engineers should make his decison by keeping welfare of society at large. He should raise this issue to his team and make them aware about the design flaw.They should go back to drawnig board and make another design which dont have any safety defect like earliear one and after eliminating those safety defect they sholud give it green signal for mass production.
It doesn't matter remeady is expensive or inexpensive on ehical ground he shouldn't give green signal to any design that have some safety defect which my risk people's life who will use it.