Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Please answer if you know it and can answer it fully. I have posted it before an

ID: 3047771 • Letter: P

Question

Please answer if you know it and can answer it fully. I have posted it before and got incorrect answers.

1. In order to estimate counts and rates of work-related fatalities, the National Traumatic Occupational Fatality system has introduced a tick-box on the death certificate to indicate "injury at work." Kraus et al. (Am Epidemiol 1995; 141: 973-9) attempted to validate this "injury at work" classification system against a gold standard [International Classification of Diseases (ICD) death certificate codes designating deaths that occurred during work-related activities]. After reviewing a sample of 100,000 death certificates, the authors reported the following: 1,195 true positives; 788 false positives; 97,672 true negatives; 345 false negatives. ("positive" indicates that the tick-box was checked; "negative" indicates that it was not checked; "true" indicates agreement between the tick-box and the ICD code) Using the countsoedabove,complete the 2:2 table below: (2 pts)j ICD Classification Not work related Death Certificate Work-related TOTAL Work-related Not work-related TOTAL b. What are the sensitivity and specificity of the "injury at work" classification system? (4 pts) c. What is the positive predictive value? In your own words, how would you interpret this value? (3 ts Based on these data is the death certificate "injury at work" classification system likely to underestimate or overestimate the true number of work-related fatal injuries? (2 pts) d.

Explanation / Answer

A)Given,

Sample size=1,00,000

True positive=1195

False positive=788

True negative=97672

False negative=345

A.a) the table would look like

ICD classification

Death certificate

Work related

Not work related

Total

Work related

1195(true positive, A)

788(false positive, B)

1983

Not work related

345(false negative, C)

97672(true negative, D)

98017

Total

1540

98460

100000

A.b) for injury at work classification system,

Sensitivity=(A/A+C)*100

Sensitivity =(1195/1195+345)*100

Sensitivity =1195/1540*100

Sensitivity =77.59%

Specificity=(D/D+B)*100

Specificity =97672/98460*100

Specificity =99.19%

A.c) positive predicted value=(A/A+B)*100

positive predicted value =1195/1983*100

positive predicted value =60.26%

This indicates that, 60.26% of deaths classified as “injury at work” are infact real/true injury at work

A.d) Positive Likelihood Ratio=sensitivity/1-specificity

Positive Likelihood Ratio =0.77/1-0.99

Positive Likelihood Ratio =77

Negative Likelihood Ratio=1-sensitivity/specificity

Negative Likelihood Ratio =1-0.77/0.99

Negative Likelihood Ratio =0.23

From the above values we can conclude that “injury at work” classification system is likely to over-estimate

ICD classification

Death certificate

Work related

Not work related

Total

Work related

1195(true positive, A)

788(false positive, B)

1983

Not work related

345(false negative, C)

97672(true negative, D)

98017

Total

1540

98460

100000