Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Carefully read the Evaluation of Arguments\" section of the instructions before

ID: 3444677 • Letter: C

Question

Carefully read the Evaluation of Arguments" section of the instructions before answering questions
Is the Argument Strong or Weak?

Question: Would a strong labor party promote the general welfare of the people in the United States?

Argument: No; a strong labor party would make it unattractive for private investors to risk their money in business ventures, thus causing sustained large-scle unemployment.


Question: Would a strong labor party promote the general welfare of the people in the United States?

Argument: Yes; differences between Republicans and Democrats today are not as great as the differences between liberals and conservatives within those parties.


Question: Would a strong labor party promote the general welfare of the people in the United States?

Argument: No; labor unions have called strikes in a number of important industries.


Question: Should groups in this country who are opposed to some of our government’s policies be permitted unrestricted freedom of press and speech?

Argument: Yes; a democratic state thrives on free and unrestricted discussion, including criticism.


Question: Should groups in this country who are opposed to some of our government’s policies be permitted unrestricted freedom of press and speech?

Argument: No; the countries opposed to our form of government do not permit the free expression of our points of view in their territories.

Question: Should groups in this country who are opposed to some of our government’s policies be permitted unrestricted freedom of press and speech?

Argument: No; if given full freedom of press and speech, opposition groups would cause serious internal strife, making our government basically unstable, and eventually leading to the loss of our democracy.

Explanation / Answer

Argument: No; a strong labor party would make it unattractive for private investors to risk their money in business ventures, thus causing sustained large-scle unemployment. Weak argument.

Argument: Yes; differences between Republicans and Democrats today are not as great as the differences between liberals and conservatives within those parties. Weak argument.

Argument: No; labor unions have called strikes in a number of important industries. Strong argument.

Argument: Yes; a democratic state thrives on free and unrestricted discussion, including criticism. Strong argument.

Argument: No; the countries opposed to our form of government do not permit the free expression of our points of view in their territories. Weak argument.

Argument: No; if given full freedom of press and speech, opposition groups would cause serious internal strife, making our government basically unstable, and eventually leading to the loss of our democracy. Strong argument.