Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Carefully read the Evaluation of Arguments\" section of the instructions before

ID: 3444678 • Letter: C

Question

Carefully read the Evaluation of Arguments" section of the instructions before answering questions
Is the Argument Strong or Weak?

Question: Do juries decide court cases fairly when one of the opposing parties is rich and the other is poor?

Argument: No; because rich people can afford to hire better lawyers than poor people, and juries are influenced by the skill of the opposing lawyers.

Question: Should pupils be excused from public schools to receive religious instruction in their own churches during school hours?

Argument: No; having public-school children go off to their separate churches during school hours would seriously interfere with the educational process and create friction among children of different religions.

Question: Should pupils be excused from public schools to receive religious instruction in their own churches during school hours?

Argument: Yes; religious instruction would help overcome moral emptiness, weakness, and lack of consideration for other people, all of which appear to be current problems in our nation.

Question: Should pupils be excused from public schools to receive religious instruction in their own churches during school hours?

Argument: Yes; religious instruction is very important to the preservation of our democratic values.

Question: Should pupils be excused from public schools to receive religious instruction in their own churches during school hours?

Argument: No; religious instruction during school hours would violate our constitutional separation of church and state; those who desire such instruction are free to get it after school hours.

Explanation / Answer

Argument: No; because rich people can afford to hire better lawyers than poor people, and juries are influenced by the skill of the opposing lawyers. Strong argument.

Argument: No; having public-school children go off to their separate churches during school hours would seriously interfere with the educational process and create friction among children of different religions. Strong argument.

Argument: Yes; religious instruction would help overcome moral emptiness, weakness, and lack of consideration for other people, all of which appear to be current problems in our nation. Weak argument.

Argument: Yes; religious instruction is very important to the preservation of our democratic values. Weak argument.

Argument: No; religious instruction during school hours would violate our constitutional separation of church and state; those who desire such instruction are free to get it after school hours. Steong argument.