Anselm argues for the view that God is by nature . . . A. a contingent being. B.
ID: 3467472 • Letter: A
Question
Anselm argues for the view that God is by nature . . .
A. a contingent being.
B. a greatest possible contingent being.
C. a necessary being.
D. all of the above.
E. None of the above
3. Aquinas argues for the view that . . . A. anything in motion requires a cause.
B. only irregular motion requires a cause.
C. motion can occur without a cause.
D. All of the above
E. None of the above
4. Aquinas argues for the view that a contingent being is . . .
A. a being whose nonexistence is impossible.
B. a being whose existence is caused by itself.
C. a being whose nonexistence is possible.
D. all of the above
5. Moreland argues for . . .
A. an infinite number of universes.
B. a single atheistic universe on the basis of chance.
C. God’s existence based on the irreducible and personal nature of consciousness.
D. None of the above
6. Moreland argues for . . .
A. a theory of consciousness consistent with atheistic physicalism.
B. a theory of consciousness consistent with agnosticism.
C. a theory of consciousness consistent with deism.
D. a theory of consciousness consistent with theism.
E. None of the above
7. Moreland argues for the view . . .
A. that atheistic physicalism can provide a personal explanation of consciousness.
B. that atheistic physicalism cannot provide a personal explanation of consciousness, whereas theism can.
C. All of the above
D. None of the above
8. Moreland argues for the view that a personal explanation . . .
A. consists entirely in providing a mechanistic explanation.
B. consists entirely in providing a neural explanation.
C. consists in providing no explanation because persons are not real.
D. All of the above
E. None of the above
Explanation / Answer
Ans : C) a necessary being
Anselm said that if god exists then his existence is necessary. He said since God is not logically impossible thing , so his existence is necessary and therfore god exists.
It was the second argument of Anselm.