Identify people e.g., peers, family, friends, faculty and ask about the attitude
ID: 3468021 • Letter: I
Question
Identify people e.g., peers, family, friends, faculty and ask about the attitudes they hold regarding the criminal justice system; are they more conservative or liberal and additionally, note demographic information of the interviewees.
Chapter 3
Given the resource crisis in the CJS, in part due to a high burnout rate, what is the best solution to the overwhelming caseload experienced by public defenders? How might the suggested solution impact other aspects of the CJS?
Identify an exonerated case and determine the cause(s) of why it was exonerated and then discuss remedies. What additional measures can take place to increase the reliability of eyewitness testimony? What should happen to police who plant evidence or prosecutors who withhold evidence? How can the system increase the reliability of scientific evidence?
Chapter 4
Discuss the age-crime curve with students so as to demonstrate career criminals/chronic offenders versus a criminal career. Discuss potential social and personal factors and theories that play into the age-crime curve (e.g., Moffitt’s taxonomies, self-control, social learning, life-course/developmental).
What factors may influence both true/false positives and false negatives? (e.g., social, psychological, and biological backgrounds, education, etc)
Explanation / Answer
The interview with friends, peers and family members, we get some conditional statements which related to the CJS. The attitude towards Criminal Justice System, we get different aspects and understanding, some are positive and others are the negative and neutral attitude.
The caseloads of public defenders can consider in many aspects like social norms, legal conditions, and human rights, the CJS experienced various situations so that we need to create a mutual condition which can benefit society as well as accuse.
The exoneration occurs when a conviction for the crime is reserved. If we look out the case of Mr. Hough, we can find the exoneration. The case of Mr. Hough experienced many reserved conditions related to law implementation.
The eyewitness testimony is a very important part of any case so that we need to increase the reliability, for this purpose, cross-questioning and logical argument place good efforts and increase the eyewitness testimony.
The role of the police to collect evidence is important so that we need to follow ethics as well as scientific methods to collect and analyze data. The scientific evidence is a key factor of CJS so that we need to identify the evidence and conditions accordingly.
The reliability of scientifically based on the logic rather than the legal condition, we need to use eyewitness and proper analysis of given data as well as user experiences.
The age-crime curve helps us to understand multiple aspects of criminal activities and situation, we can increase the ability to identify criminal activities as well as perfect evidence.
Self-control and self-learning theories provide the proper information about the age-crime curve, we need to analyze the data and evidence.
There are many factors like education, psychological background and social background which affects the cases and legal regulations. Age, gender, and labels also play an important role to understand the condition.
?