In generalizing from a sample, in order to achieve an error margin of plus or mi
ID: 3492092 • Letter: I
Question
In generalizing from a sample, in order to achieve an error margin of plus or minus 3 percentage points at a confidence level of about 95 percent, what’s the smallest random sample we can get away with, regardless of the size of the population?
a.100 b. 500 c. 1000
Identify the fallacy in the following passage.
My trip to Ixtapa was terrific. I’m sure you’ll have a great time if you go to Acapulco."
a. Hasty Generalization b. Weak Analogy c. Post Hoc d. Slippery Slope
"Gun control is pointless. We can’t stop every lunatic from getting his hand on a gun."
a. False Dilemma b. Straw Man c. Appeal to Emotion d. Irrelevant Conclusion
"Move to Toronto? Why would anyone want to live on the North Pole?"
a. Irrelevant conclusion b. Straw Man c. Appeal to emotion d. Appeal to nature
"To me, she doesn’t make any sense. She’s just another airhead trying to impress the guys."
a. False dilemma b. Irrelevant Conclusion c. Ad Hominem d. Appeal to emotion
"The Sims just have to do well in their new business. They’ve put everything they had into it, and they absolutely must succeed or they’ll be ruined. I’m thinking they’ll do great work and I’m certainly going to throw my business their way."
a. Straw Man Fallacy b. Post Hoc c. Begging the question d. Appeal to emotion
Explanation / Answer
Question-2:
Answer:
b. Weak Analogy
Description:
A weak analogy occurs when a person draws a comparison between two concepts, situations, or things to link them together in an argument, even though the connection between the two is not strong enough to make the case. It's a type of fallacy or flaw that can damage an argument.
Question-3:
Answer:
d. Irrelevant Conclusion
Description:
Ignoratio elenchi, also known as irrelevant conclusion, is the informal fallacy of presenting an argument that may or may not be logically valid, but fails nonetheless to address the issue in question. More colloquially, it is also known as missing the point.
Question-4:
Answer:
b. Straw Man
Description:
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.
Question-5:
Answer:
d. Appeal to emotion
Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones is a logical fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence. Instead of facts, persuasive language is used to develop the foundation of an appeal to emotion-based argument.
Question-6:
c. Begging the question
Description:
Begging the question, sometimes known by its Latin name petitio principii (meaning assuming the initial point), is a logical fallacy in which the writer or speaker assumes the statement under examination to be true. In other words, begging the question involves using a premise to support itself.