Please simplify the explanation for the general scientific summary shown below.
ID: 3498005 • Letter: P
Question
Please simplify the explanation for the general scientific summary shown below. I added the second photo so you will not have to rotate to read Please simplify the explanation for the general scientific summary shown below. I added the second photo so you will not have to rotate to read ures, administration of greater trial numbers, and high central executive demands yielded mode E p, er sequencing) wM measures. Results: The use öf pai di between-groups effect sizes. Moreover, the combination of these best-case procedures, case procedures (i.e., absolute scoring, administration o ge to worst- few trials, use of discontinue rules, and low central executive demands), these findings explai inconsist revised clinical measures that utilize best increase in correct group classification Conel HD-related WM deficits in highlight the need for eneral Scientific Summary Deficits of working memory are hypothesized to underlie attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder lsivity, While support for this hypothesis en relatively mixed across existing studies, findings from the current study suggest that previous equivocal findings result from methodological differences, and large-magnitude ADHD- related deficits are expected when best-case procedures are utilized. Implementation of findings from DHD) symptoms of inattention, hyperactivit has be this study is expected to ultimately deficits in both clinical and laboratory settings. improve the examination of ADHD-related working memory Keywords: attention-deficithyperactivity disorder, children, working memory, methodological variability, neuropsychological assessment an two decades, considerable research has examined Tannock, 2002) of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorde rking memory (WM)-the temporary storage, main- Meta-analytic reviews of WM functioning in children w ental manipulation of phonological and visuospatial reveal overall moderate- to large-magnitude (d 69- Baddeley, 2007)--as an associated neurocognitive Alderson, & Hudec, 2012, d = .43-106: Martinuss owerby, Seal, & Tripp, 2011), candidate core feature Hogg-Johnson, & Tannock, 2005; d 59-75: Wil 2008), and potential endophenotype (Castellanos & Nigg, Faraone, & Pennington, 2005) phonological and WM performance deficits, while experimental studi conceptual framework of Baddeley (2010)'s m working-memory model, demonstrate children withAExplanation / Answer
General Summary from image:
Deficits of working memory have hypothesized to underlie attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. While support for this hypothesis has been relatively mixed across existing studies, findings from the current study suggest that previous equivocal findings result from methodological differences, and large magnitude ADHD related deficits are expected when best case procedures are utilized. Implementation of findings from this study is expected to ultimately improve the examination of ADHD related working memory deficits in both clinical and laboratory settings.
Explanation:
The paper talks about the need for revising clinical measures to maximize the utilization of best- case procedures. The findings in the paper detail the inconsistencies or varied findings in ADHD related working memory deficits. The findings are based on two test sets of boys whose age ranges between 8 - 12 and observed based on the presence or absence of AD/HD in the two groups. One phonological and two clinical measures have been used with respect to working memory findings.
Deficits of working memory have hypothesized to underlie attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity.
If one takes a look at the working memory model, one can learn that working memory is the short-term memory where temporary information is stored based on which decisions are made and explanations are sought for the data on hand. So any shortcoming in the working of the working memory has been proposed as having underlying chances of AD/HD including the symptoms mentioned in the sentence. It is not just a proposal for such explanation rather since it is a scientific hypothesis, it has been tested and can further be tested to draw out inferences.
While support for this hypothesis has been relatively mixed across existing studies, findings from the current study suggest that previous equivocal findings result from methodological differences, and large magnitude ADHD related deficits are expected when best case procedures are utilized.
There have been previous studies where this hypothesis has been tested and the corresponding findings have had mixed results, meaning they all have not given a solid answer as to whether or not this hypothesis can be accepted as a standard. The findings from this particular set of tests suggest that previous test findings which are uncertain or ambiguous maybe because of the practices, procedures or rules used in undertaking those tests. Also, when best case procedures were used such as partial scoring procedures, administration of greater trial numbers, and high central executive demands were used, deficits in working memory related to ADHD were observed to be of far greater magnitude.
Implementation of findings from this study is expected to ultimately improve the examination of ADHD related working memory deficits in both clinical and laboratory settings.
The findings of this studies, if implemented are likely to eventually improve the way in which working memory deficits are studied and examined in AD/HD cases both in direct patient observations and tests carried out in the laboratory as part of scientific research.
Deficits of working memory have hypothesized to underlie attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. While support for this hypothesis has been relatively mixed across existing studies, findings from the current study suggest that previous equivocal findings result from methodological differences, and large magnitude ADHD related deficits are expected when best case procedures are utilized. Implementation of findings from this study is expected to ultimately improve the examination of ADHD related working memory deficits in both clinical and laboratory settings.
Explanation:
The paper talks about the need for revising clinical measures to maximize the utilization of best- case procedures. The findings in the paper detail the inconsistencies or varied findings in ADHD related working memory deficits. The findings are based on two test sets of boys whose age ranges between 8 - 12 and observed based on the presence or absence of AD/HD in the two groups. One phonological and two clinical measures have been used with respect to working memory findings.
Deficits of working memory have hypothesized to underlie attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity.
If one takes a look at the working memory model, one can learn that working memory is the short-term memory where temporary information is stored based on which decisions are made and explanations are sought for the data on hand. So any shortcoming in the working of the working memory has been proposed as having underlying chances of AD/HD including the symptoms mentioned in the sentence. It is not just a proposal for such explanation rather since it is a scientific hypothesis, it has been tested and can further be tested to draw out inferences.
While support for this hypothesis has been relatively mixed across existing studies, findings from the current study suggest that previous equivocal findings result from methodological differences, and large magnitude ADHD related deficits are expected when best case procedures are utilized.
There have been previous studies where this hypothesis has been tested and the corresponding findings have had mixed results, meaning they all have not given a solid answer as to whether or not this hypothesis can be accepted as a standard. The findings from this particular set of tests suggest that previous test findings which are uncertain or ambiguous maybe because of the practices, procedures or rules used in undertaking those tests. Also, when best case procedures were used such as partial scoring procedures, administration of greater trial numbers, and high central executive demands were used, deficits in working memory related to ADHD were observed to be of far greater magnitude.
Implementation of findings from this study is expected to ultimately improve the examination of ADHD related working memory deficits in both clinical and laboratory settings.
The findings of this studies, if implemented are likely to eventually improve the way in which working memory deficits are studied and examined in AD/HD cases both in direct patient observations and tests carried out in the laboratory as part of scientific research.