Please help, FYI DONOT REPOST RESPONSE ALREADY ON CHEGGS. Thanks In organization
ID: 413041 • Letter: P
Question
Please help, FYI DONOT REPOST RESPONSE ALREADY ON CHEGGS. Thanks
In organizational change, there is a debate in the literature about the benefits of proactive versus reactive change efforts. pick one side of the debate, either proactive change or reactive change. While both positions in each argument are important, your task is to state why you believe your side is more important than the other position and support the argument with peer review literature. it should contain a conclusion and the reasons to accept the conclusion.
Explanation / Answer
I strongly support that change efforts should be more pro-active rather than reactive. Below are the supporting arguments for pro-active approach:
Conclusion is that reactive approach is a less preferred approach as it involves roll back of changes, more resistance by the employees and inadequate planning, whereas pro-active approach is always adopted by many companies sand have observed much better results.
Reasons to accept the pro-active approach has already been described above i.e. it saves cost, effort, better planning is done, less of real time issues are created and more of acceptance to change is observed.