Philosophy(Ethics) QUESTION 1 Some argue against cloning by asserting we should
ID: 130489 • Letter: P
Question
Philosophy(Ethics)
QUESTION 1
Some argue against cloning by asserting we should trust
nature
our own intuitive reactioins to cloning that tell us it is simply wrong
science
the future
0.5 points
QUESTION 2
The state's infliction of harm or pain, in accordance with a set of legally established laws, on those that break the law is
just punishment
due process
legal punishment
a deterrence
0.5 points
QUESTION 3
What is NOT an objection to human cloning?
playing God
clones would not be unique individuals
rights wouldn't extend to clones
clones would be denied the right to an open future
0.5 points
a.nature
b.our own intuitive reactioins to cloning that tell us it is simply wrong
c.science
d.the future
Explanation / Answer
1. The answer is Option A. Individuals objecting to cloning assert that we should trust nature.
2. The answer is Option C. The infliction of harm or pain by the State, based on pre-established laws refers to legal punishment.
3. The answer is Option B. Clones not being unique in their characteristics is not an objection to cloning.