Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Please answer question 4. 4. (10 points In 1953, Maurice Allais proposed the fol

ID: 3050809 • Letter: P

Question


Please answer question 4.

4. (10 points In 1953, Maurice Allais proposed the following thonught esperiment. You unust make a choice between Gamble A and Gamble B (you can interpret these dollar amounts as final wealth levels): Gamble A. $1, 000,000 for sure Gamble B. $1,000,000 with probability 0.89 $5, 000, 000 with probability 0.10 $0 with probability 0.01 Which would you choose? Next, youust make a choice between Gamble C and Gamble D: Gamble C:.$1, 000,000 with probability 0.11 S0 with probability 0.89 Gamble D: $5, 000,000 with probability 0.10 S0 with probability 0.90 Which would you choose? Most people choose Gambles A and D. Explain why, no matter what utility function a person has over final wealth, this pattern of choices is inconsistent with expected utility maximization.

Explanation / Answer

In gamble A we get $1000,000 for sure so there in no ambiguity

In gamble B

Expected return = $1000,000 *0.89+$5000,000*0.1+0= $1390,000

Expected return B-Expected Return A=$390000

I would chooose Gamble B

Gamble C Expected reurn=$1000,000*0.11+0=$110,000

Gamble D Expected return =$5000,000*0.1 +0=500,000

I would choose D as it has higher expected value

Most people would choose Gambles A and D because they fear that they will not recieve anything in return so they settle for value which is certain or which is percieved less risky in this case gamble A is less risky than gamble B and gamblr D is less risky than gamble C