In 700–900 words, provide answers to the following questions: The author has alr
ID: 3731448 • Letter: I
Question
In 700–900 words, provide answers to the following questions:
The author has already summarized the article with an abstract. Would an annotated bibliography be a redundant piece of work in this case? Why or why not?
Give an example of an incorrect annotated entry in a bibliography and explain why it is considered an incorrect annotated bibliography.
Is the following example a correct annotated bibliography? Why or why not?
“This source is a summary of IBM’s history. It gave me a good understanding of the company’s culture and business model. This website also has the market data that I can use for my research.”
One of the requirements for being accepted as a peer-reviewed article to be published in a refereed journal is the article’s contribution to the field. Define contribution to the field in your own words. Give an example of a contribution to the field from one of the sources you have selected for your project.
Respond to the questions using the lessons and vocabulary found in the reading. Support your answers with examples and research. Your responses should clarify your understanding of the topic. They should be your own, original and free from plagiarism. Follow APA formatting for citing sources.
Explanation / Answer
Annotated bibliography
Annotated bibliography can reduce piece of work and also gives a short summary of its contents. so we can easily understand the articles, user can read whole articles with short time. It is more than a works cited list, which gives a bibliographic citation for the source. These annotations following steps.
1.Citation of tje source, focus of the book, article or website
2.Summarize the research paper
3. Evaluate the source's method, conclusions or reliability
4 .Record your reactions to the source
Why we can write an annotated bibliography?
They provide readers with background information about your sources, that is a great way to organize your research by helping you critically evaluate books, journal articles, websites and other resources.
Example of an incorrect annotated entry in a bibliography
Burger, Terry D an Deborah Finkel RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BODY MODFICATIONS AND VERY HIGH RISK BEHAVIO IN A COLLEGE POULATION. College Student Journal 203 (2002).
This is a sholarely artical about whether students who have tattoos are more likely to take part in risky behavior.
Forbes, George. COLLEGE STUDENTS WITH TATOOS AND PIERCINGS MOTIVES FAMILY EXPERIENCES PERSONALITY FACTORS AND PERCEPTION BY OTHERS Pyschological Reports 89, 774.
Forbes wrote this to talk about college students with tatoos and how others see them.
Ebensten, Hanns. Pierced hearts and true love tatooing survey of its present stat London: Derek (1953)
This novel talks about the history of tattooing and where it is today or it’s present state.
Sullivan, N.. TATTOOED BODIES SUBJECTIVITY TEXTUALITYETHICS, AND PLEASURE. Westport Connecticut London: Praeger (2001)
this book talks abot tattooing and pleasure.
Phinney, S (12/9/02) TATTOO YOU – AND ME MACLEAN’S, 115
The above example shows some incorrected annotated bibilography
1. The citations are not properly formatted: the titles are in all capitals, and the punctuation is wrong or missing.
2. The annotations do not correctly describe the items. They are too short and in run-on sentences.
3. The annotations do not say whether the material is good for the project.
4. The annotations are not organized.
Example of a correct annotated bibliography
Burger, Terry D. and Deborah Finkel. “Relationships Between Body Modifications and Very High Risk Behavior in a College Population.” College Student Journal 36.2 (2001): 207-218. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. URI Library 12 Jan. 2005 .
This article describes a study of 117 undergraduates that examines whether college students who have tattoos or multiple piercings are more likely to engage in risky behaviors such as drunk driving or having unsafe sex. In addition, the researchers looked at subjects’ self-esteem levels as a predictor.
The authors found that students with body modifications were more likely to engage in high-risk behaviors than those without body modifications.
The authors are researchers at Indiana University Southeast, and the article was published in a peer-reviewed journal. Although written for researchers, the article was easily understandable, and because it discusses a relationship between tattoos and behavior, it will be useful for my research.
Forbes, Gordon B. “College Students with Tattoos and Piercings: Motives, Family Experiences, Personality Factors, and Perception by Others.” Psychological Reports 89.3 (2002): 776-793.
This is an article from a peer-reviewed journal in which the author, Gordon Forbes, a researcher at Millikin University, describes original research he did to investigate what kinds of people got tattoos, why they got them, and how others viewed people with body modifications. He also discusses the stereotypes associated with getting tattoos and people who have them.
Written for researchers, the article includes a literature review, a description of the methods the researcher used, the results of the survey, and a discussion. The article includes tables showing common reasons why people decided to get a tattoo, or why they didn’t. This article will be useful, as it discusses the demographics and social aspects of tattooing.
Phinney, Sandra. “Tattoo You – And Me.” Maclean’s, 9 Mar. 2003: 65.
This is a chatty, conversational article written by a woman who secretly wanted a tattoo and finally got one. It describes her mixed feelings towards her daughter’s desire to get a tattoo and her own experience during the tattooing process. This was published last year in Maclean’s, a popular magazine from Canada. Although it’s easy to understand, it’s too basic, and there isn’t enough useful, unbiased information included.
The above example shows some correct annotated bibilography
1. Citations are properly formatted, in alphabetical order, with the second line indented.
2.The annotations are written in complete sentences and describe what the material is about.
3. The annotations evaluate whether or not the item is good for the project.
4. The citations are typed and everything is spelled correctly.
What is Peer Review?
Peer review is a publication processbased on peer evaluation that ensures contributions made to the scholarly community are based on accurate, reliable, and original research findings and analysis.
Example project
project title:
Context Sensitive Query Expansion Based onFuzzy Clustering of Index Terms.
peer- reviewd article shows- Title is lengthy and specific
Abstract
Document summarization based on single or multi document which aims at extract the specific information from the set of documents. Information has to be increased everyday and huge amount of documents are made available in the internet. While reading this huge amount of information in our documents that will leads to waste of time, efforts and capacity. This need to access relevant information without goes through the entire summary. The intelligent index model used for document summarization based on context sensitive document indexing technique. This technique introduce Bernoulli model for finding the probability of two terms from large corpus. The indexing weight has to be computed for sentence extraction. In this approach document summarization compress the most salient sentences from the whole document. Finally it can produce a summarization points and it convey the less space compared to original document. It can easily access the requiring information. The Experimental result achieves the best performance.
peer- reviewd article shows-Abstract describe the scope of article using advanced language, describing the purpose and design of the research study.
peer- reviewd article shows-Presents an original research study with data and analysis of findings.
Appearance of whole paper
peer- reviewd article shows-It is plain and simple, throughtout with minimal use of colour and no advertising.
Structure with section and sub headings indicating an original research study.
1. abstract
2. purpose
3.methods and procedures
4.results
5. analysis and conclusions.
REFERENCES
[1] http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/duc/pubs/.
[2] M. Amini and P. Gallinari. The use of unlabeled data to improve supervised learning for textsummarization. In Prodeedings of SIGIR 2002.
[3] D. Arnold, L. Balkan, S. Meijer, R. Humphreys, andL. Sadler. Machine Translation: an IntroductoryGuide. Blackwells-NCC, 1994.
[4] C. M. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and MachineLearning. Springer, 2006.
[5] J. Conroy and D. O'Leary. Text summarization viahidden markov models. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2001.
[6] I. S. Dhillon. Co-clustering documents and wordsusing bipartite spectral graph partitioning. In Proceedings of KDD 2001.
[7] C. Ding and X. He. K-means clustering and principalcomponent analysis. In Prodeedings of ICML 2004.
[8] C. Ding, T. Li, W. Peng, and H. Park. Orthogonalnonnegative matrix t-factorizations for clustering. In Proceedings of KDD 2006.
peer- reviewd article shows-claims are supported by in-text citations within the article and a long reference list at the end.